Dems defend yes votes on Iran War Powers Resolution, warn of protracted crisis
NEWNow you can listen to Fox News articles!
The House voted Thursday on the Democrat-led Iran War Powers Resolution, which aims to limit President Donald Trump’s military authority in Tehran – setting the stage for a sharp debate over the superpowers, and renewing new questions about what level of consultation, if any, presidents should seek from Congress before proceeding with future military strikes.
If passed, the Democrat-led Iran War Powers Resolution would have required Trump to stop using any US armed forces against Iran unless “clearly authorized” by Congress. House managers are sharply divided on this issue along party lines.
Speaking to Fox News Digital in an interview after the House vote, Rep. Pramila Jayapal, D-Wash., defended her support for the new Iran War Powers Resolution. He said, in his opinion, Trump exceeded his authority and invoked Article I of the Constitution. “It’s about our Article I powers,” he said.
Congress alone “has the power to declare war, and we will not put our soldiers at risk based on the ‘opinion’ of any President without a side,” Jayapal said in a statement.
Lawmaker Pramila Jayapal urged Democrats to “stand firm” during the federal government shutdown. (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)
The vote came amid heightened tensions in the Middle East following a US strike on Iran in recent days — and as some Democrats accused the Trump administration of rushing to involve the US in yet another protracted war in the Middle East without consulting Congress first.
Republicans, on the other hand, maintain that the White House is acting within its mandate in the best interest of the country.
Jayapal told Fox News Digital that he has long criticized other presidents who have failed to consult with Congress before taking military action — including under former President Joe Biden, after he ordered U.S. airstrikes against Iran-backed forces in Syria.
“I also spoke out against Biden,” Jayapal said of Biden’s 2021 airstrikes in Syria.
HOUSE DEMOCRATS VOTE TO CONTINUE DHS SHUTDOWN DESPITE IRAN THREAT, NOEM EXCLUSION
President Donald Trump monitored US military operations in Iran following an Israeli strike on Tehran on Saturday, Feb. 28, 2026. (@WhiteHouse/X)
“I spoke out against every Democratic and Republican president who tried to go to war without authorization, because I don’t think there should be a party,” he continued, adding: “It’s about our Article I powers.”
His comments come as the Democrat-led approach has drawn strong opposition from nearly all GOP House members, as well as a minority of Democrats in the chamber, who have noted that the commander-in-chief must maintain a degree of flexibility to respond to foreign threats and protect American workers and interests abroad.
They also criticized the Democrats who supported the Iran War Powers Resolution for taking a position to second-guess military decisions at a critical time overseas.
Earlier this week, a group of Democrats urged House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., to keep the House of Representatives in DC next week, citing the “immediately evolving” situation in Iran.
TRUMP SAYS THEY ARE ‘FAILURES’, DEMS WOULD APPRECIATE THE DECISION HE MADE ON IRAN.
President Donald Trump is seen monitoring the three-site Iranian nuclear enrichment project at the White House in this 2025 photo. (Daniel Torok/The White House via Getty Images)
Supporters argue that limiting the president’s authority — and doing so amid a tense national security situation — would embolden foreign adversaries and undermine the US’s ability to respond.
Democrats, meanwhile, continued to voice concerns that Trump had failed to demonstrate an “imminent” threat that would justify non-aligned military action under his Article II powers.
The vote underscores a broad, long-running bipartisan debate over the scope of the war powers and the role of Congress in authorizing the use of force — tensions that have engulfed many administrations in conflict.
Jayapal, meanwhile, appeared unfazed by the GOP pushback.
He noted that, in his opinion, American action in Iran could take a long time, and could have “far greater consequences” than US involvement in Syria.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS PROGRAM
“There are real soldiers on the ground here in a way that was not the case in Syria,” Jayapal said. “And I think it’s a big, big fight with no threats coming.”
Related Article
